Upcoming Event – Brian Morris on Polygraphs

Tuesday, March 26 – 2:15 PM – Room 1270

“The Science of the Polygraph” with LIVE Demonstration
with Brian Morris, President of the Idaho Polygraph Association

Please join the Federalist Society in welcoming Brian Morris, President of the Idaho Polygraph Association.  Mr. Morris will be presenting a fascination overview of the science of polygraph testing, its use in criminal investigations and prosecutions, and the controversy surrounding the admissibility and reliability of polygraph results.  Professor Mark Pettit will be providing a short response, and conducting the Q&A session.  Lunch will be provided.  All are welcome!

Brian Morris is a Primary Certified Instructor of Polygraph with the American Polygraph Association.  He is one of only 158 such instructors to obtain this distinction.  He is an approved examiner in Idaho, California, Washington, Montana, Wyoming, and Utah, wherein he is also a state licensed examiner.  Mr. Morris holds his JD from the University of Idaho.

The Federalist Society is a group of conservative and libertarian law students, lawyers, professors, and judges interested in the current state of the legal order. We believe the state exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of powers is central to the Constitution, and that it is the duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be. Most importantly, however, we believe that our legal system ought to concern itself foremost with the advancement of individual liberty.

For more information, please e-mail contact@bufedsoc.org.

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

Upcoming Event – Stuart Anderson on Immigration Reform

Thursday, February 28 – 12:45 PM – Room 832

“Immigration Reform from the Free Market Perspective”
with Stuart Anderson, NFAP

Please join us in welcoming Stuart Anderson this coming Thursday.  He will be discussing the current state of our immigration regime and will suggest methods of reform, all from the perspective of the the free market and the advancement of individual liberty.

Stuart Anderson is Executive Director of the National Foundation for American Policy, a non-partisan public policy research organization focusing on trade, immigration, and related issued based in Arlington, VA.  From August 2001 to January 2003, Anderson served as Executive Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning, and Counselor to the Commissioner at the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS).  Before that, he spent nearly five years on Capitol Hill on the Senate Immigration Subcommittee, first for Senator Spencer Abraham, and then as Staff Director of the subcommittee for Senator Sam Brownback.  Anderson has served as Director of Trade and Immigration Studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, D.C., where he produced reports on the military contributions of immigrants and the role of immigrants in high technology.

Anderson holds an M.A. from Georgetown University and a B.A. in political science from Drew University.  He has published articles in the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, and other publications.  He is the author of the book Immigration (Greenwood, 2010).

The Federalist Society is a group of conservative and libertarian law students, lawyers, professors, and judges interested in the current state of the legal order.  We believe that the State exists to preserve freedom, that the separation of powers is central to the Constitution, and that it is the duty of the judiciary to say what the law is, not what it should be.  Most importantly, however, we believe that our legal system ought to concern itself foremost with the advancement of individual liberty.

For more information, please e-mail contact@bufedsoc.org.

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

Upcoming Event – Walter Olson on Tort Reform

Monday, October 29 – 1:00 PM – Room 1270

“Torts, Social Costs, and the Invisible Fist Theory”
with Walter Olson, Cato Institute

Judges and lawyers have helped to create a huge expansion in the size, number, and invasiveness of lawsuits in the hope that our legal system should become an “invisible” fist for social reform, a coercive force for social good.  But has this unleashing of litigation done cruel, grave harm and little lasting social good?  And what substantive reforms, especially in the realm of tort law, can help us strike a balance between seeking justice and controlling the floodgates of litigation?

Please join us in welcoming Walter Olson this coming Monday.  He will be addressing the foregoing questions, and many more, as he discusses “Torts, Social Costs, and the Invisible Fist Theory.”

Walter Olson is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute’s Center for Constitutional Studies.  Formerly a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute, Olson has been a columnist for Times Online as well as Reason.  His writing appears regularly in the Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, and the New York Post.  Olson frequently appears before Congress and on television, and has been dubbed by the Washington Post as the “intellectual guru of tort reform.” His approximately 400 broadcast appearances include all the major networks, CNN, Fox News, PBS, NPR, and “Oprah.”  Olson is the founder of Overlawyered.com, widely cited as the oldest blog on law as well as one of the most popular.

For more information, please e-mail contact@bufedsoc.org.

 

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

Today! Entrepreneurialism & Regulation – 1 PM – Room 1270

The recent Occupy protests have decried the alleged greed of Wall Street and demanded more regulations and taxes over American corporations. How does this demand for increased centralized governmental control impact the ability of businesses to grow and create jobs? Come out and hear Mr. O’Hare discuss the impact of governmental regulations on job creation and why corporations need to keep an entrepreneurial mindset as they grow.

There has been a menu change because Chipotle could not handle our catering order, so Qdoba will be served.

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

A Bad Day for the Feds

Remember to come to the Ilya Shapiro v. Kevin Outterson debate tomorrow, Thursday March 29th at 1 PM in Barristers Hall on Obamacare!

According to Reason’s coverage, Tuesday was a bad day for the Federal Government. According to Reason, the solicitor general had no answer for how healthcare differed from food or burial markets.

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

In case you haven’t been following..

The arguments over the Obamacare mandate begin today (yesterday was an argument over whether the mandate was a penalty or tax for standing/procedural reasons).

Check out Reason’s coverage of the first day:

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

The Tragedy of the Commons

Prof. Sean Mullholland Explains Tragedy of the Commons:

Which modern resources are in danger of tragedy-of-the-commons-exploitation? Try water. The right to use water is freely distributed in the US, and nobody pays for the actual product itself (just delivery). Is it not crazy to expose one of our most precious resources to the dangers of overuse?

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

Today! 1 PM – Alan Gura on Gun Rights

Alan Gura, the famed litigator from the recent watershed Heller and McDonald cases will be discussing Gun Rights today in Barristers Hall at 1 PM.

Lunch will be served.

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

Steve Jobs: Randian Hero

Eli Dourado rightly praises Steve Jobs as “about as close to a Randian hero as can be expected outside of a novel,” and writes an incredibly interesting post on what Jobs taught us about central planning and its low chances for success in a government context:

Is Apple successful because it was big and centrally directed, or is it big and centrally directed because it was successful? From a Hayek-Alchian perspective, the answer is clearly the latter. Having a Randian hero centrally direct a lot of resources is not, in spite of Apple’s story, a recipe for success. Instead, following a recipe for success will result in a lot of resources to direct. Finding a recipe for success, not accumulating the resources to direct, is the hard part. That is why we need competition.

The implication, of course, is that government is much less likely to stumble upon this magical recipe for success than are private actors competing in a market. Government is thus not likely to centrally plan anything as effectively as a magical-recipe-bearing guy like Jobs:

The fact that Steve Jobs centrally directed billions of dollars of resources well does not mean that central planning has much hope in our political context. States do not face the market test, or if they do, it is on large time scales that make evolution toward relatively efficient forms of organization too slow to be useful.

Maybe one day we’ll have a government that does face a more responsive market test; even then, it’s not clear that entrusting that government to do with our nation’s resources what Jobs did with Apple’s is a very good idea. Strong case for reigning in the amateurs on Capitol Hill, no?

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare

George Will takes on Elizabeth Warren

Via Cafe Hayek, George Will challenges Elizabeth Warren’s assertion that cooperative effort necessarily implies collective rewards. Read the whole thing here. Excerpt:

Warren’s emphatic assertion of the unremarkable — that the individual depends on cooperative behaviors by others — misses this point: It is conservatism, not liberalism, that takes society seriously. Liberalism preaches confident social engineering by the regulatory state. Conservatism urges government humility in the face of society’s creative complexity.

Society — hundreds of millions of people making billions of decisions daily — is a marvel of spontaneous order among individuals in voluntary cooperation. Government facilitates this cooperation with roads, schools, police, etc. — and by getting out of its way. This is a sensible, dynamic, prosperous society’s “underlying social contract.”

 

TumblrGoogle GmailTwitterShare